Legal Opinion

Wathor v. Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 2004No. 97,696PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*561BOUDREAU, J.

T1 Oklahoma County offered its employees, like plaintiff Doug Wathor, access to its self-funded health insurance program called the Oklahoma County Health and Dental Plan (Plan}. Oklahoma County hired defendant Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc. (MAA) as its third party administrator (TPA).1 MAA's Administrative Service Contract (Contract) with Oklahoma County obligated MAA to provide the ministerial and clerical services required by the Plan in connection with its operation. Under the Contract, MAA initially determines whether any particular claim for benefits qualifies for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Keel v. Titan Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Colony Insurance Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. Haworth v. JantzenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  5. Gens v. Casady SchoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API