John Paul Anderson v. State of South Carolina and the Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
South Carolina appeals from a judgment of the district court granting a writ of habeas corpus to John Paul Anderson. 1 The district court found that Anderson was denied due process because the prosecutor at his murder trial withheld specifically and generally requested materials in violation of United States v. Augers, 427 U.S. 97, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976), and Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). We affirm. 2
Anderson was convicted in 1965 of murdering his wife. The prosecution’s theory was that Anderson held his wife under water and drowned her.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chavis v. North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Anderson v. LeekeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Anderson v. South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hillman v. HinkleDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Silk-Nauni v. FieldsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1987
- Hillman v. HinkleDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Herman Charles Barnes v. Charles E. Thompson, Warden, Herman Charles Barnes v. Charles E. Thompson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Herman Charles Barnes v. Charles E. Thompson, Warden, Herman Charles Barnes v. Charles E. Thompson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995