Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Herman Charles Barnes v. Charles E. Thompson, Warden, Herman Charles Barnes v. Charles E. Thompson, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1995No. 94-4001, 94-4002Published

1Concurring in the judgmentMurnaghan, Circuit Judge

The majority today announces a new rule of Virginia state law — that the “vileness” predicate may be met in sentencing a capital defendant to death irrespective of whether the defendant observed that the victim was armed and resisting at the time the defendant fired the final shot, so long as the defendant inflicts a number of wounds and there is a lapse of time between the first wound and the wound that ultimately causes the death. Because I do not believe that the federal judiciary should announce a new rule of state criminal law when the state’s highest court has indicated that it would…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API