Legal Opinion
Hillman v. Hinkle
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided September 25, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-219-AMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
114 F.Supp.2d 497 (2000)
Michael D. HILLMAN, Petitioner,
v.
George M. HINKLE, Respondent.
No. Civ.A. 99-219-AM.
United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.
September 25, 2000.
Michael D. Hillman, Haynesville, VA, pro se.
Kathleen B. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, Bethesda, MD, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEE, District Judge.
Now before the Court is respondent's Motion to Dismiss this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, has been informed of the potentially dispositive nature of…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garnett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Garnett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007