Legal Opinion
Team Scandia, Inc. v. Greco
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided May 19, 1998No. IP 97-1956-C-B/SPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE THE ARBITRATION AWARD
BARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Vacate the Arbitration Award, alleging that the arbitrator (1) exceeded his powers, (2) violated public policy, and (3) had a disqualifying conflict of interest. Defendant rejoins that (1) the parties’ agreement prohibits judicial review of the arbitration award, (2) the arbitrator did not exceed his. powers, and (3) the arbitrator did not have a disqualifying conflict of interest. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs Motion to Vacate the Arbitration…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Clinton Cole v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- MACTEC, Inc. v. GorelickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Klumpe v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Silicon Power Corp. v. General Electric Zenith Controls, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Baugher v. Dekko Heating TechnologiesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2002
- KIM-C1, LLC v. Valent Biosciences Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.