Legal Opinion

State of New Hampshire v. Sean Brown

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 6, 2014No. 2013-0086Published

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, C.J.

Following his conviction on four counts of sale of a narcotic drug, see RSA 318-B:2 (2004) (amended 2008,2011, 2013), and our affirmance of his conviction on appeal, see State v. Brown, 159 N.H. 544 (2009), the defendant, Sean Brown, filed a motion for new trial in superior court alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. He appeals the decision of the Superior Court {Nicolosi, J.) concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to hear his claim and, therefore, denying his motion for new trial. We reverse and remand.

Recitation of the underlying facts leading to the defendant’s conviction…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. BachertNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API