Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Hileman
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 14, 2002No. 4-01-0950PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myerscough
In June 2001, plaintiff, Richard Thomas, filed an amended complaint alleging malicious prosecution against defendants, Dick Hileman and Edward Masters. The malicious prosecution action arose from a defamation action brought by Hileman, through Hileman’s attorney, Masters, against Thomas. See Hileman v. Thomas, No. 4—00— 0514 (December 5, 2000) (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23). In July 2001, defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to section 2 — 615(e) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615(e) (West 2000)), which the trial court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cult Awareness Network v. Church of Scientology InternationalIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Smith v. Michigan Buggy Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Fremarek v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Shedd v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- William J. Templeman Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nocula v. UGS CORP.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Sparks v. StarksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Gerwin v. Livingston County BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Roland MacHinery Co. v. ReedAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Rogalla v. Christie Clinic, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.