Legal Opinion

Roland MacHinery Co. v. Reed

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 20, 2003No. 4-02-0914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

In June 2002, plaintiff, Roland Machinery Company (Roland), filed a complaint against defendant, James S. Reed, seeking a declaratory judgment determining the parties’ rights under a purchase agreement, pursuant to which Reed had purchased a $175,400 bulldozer from Roland. In response, Reed filed a motion to dismiss under section 2—615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2—615 (West 2000)), alleging that Roland’s complaint did not state a cause of action for declaratory relief. Following a July 2002 hearing, the trial court granted Reed’s motion and dismissed Roland’s complaint.

R…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beahringer v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Underground Contractors Ass'n v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cunningham Brothers, Inc. v. Harry BailCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Howlett v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Adkins Energy, LLC v. Delta-T Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Regency Commercial Associates, LLC v. Lopax, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Northern Trust Co. v. County of LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Muhammad v. Muhammad-RahmahAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Akemann v. QuinnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API