Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Starks

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 27, 2006No. 1-05-2145PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Plaintiff Joseph J. Sparks filed a third amended complaint alleging willful and wanton conduct in the prosecution of an adversarial proceeding against defendants Dereck Starks and Thomas Tranckitello and the City of Chicago, which employed Starks and Tranckitello as police officers. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs third amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 2004)) because Illinois law does not provide an independent cause of action for willful and wanton conduct and because plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Vernon v. SchusterIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ziarko v. Soo Line RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Vesey v. Chicago Housing AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. DeSMET EX REL. v. County of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Krywin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Doe-3 v. McLean County Unit District No. 5 Board of DirectorsIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Ries v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Ware v. The City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Drakeford v. University of Chicago HospitalsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API