Legal Opinion

State v. Fox

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 2011No. COA10-1485PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Bernis Harold Fox (“defendant”) appeals from a conviction for felony stalking. Because evidence presented in support of defendant’s indictment amounted to double jeopardy, we vacate defendant’s conviction for felony stalking and attaining the status of habitual felon.

I. Background

On 22 February 2010, defendant was indicted for felony stalking and obtaining the status of habitual felon. Defendant was tried on *145these charges at the 20 September 2010 Criminal Session of Superior Court, Harnett County. The State’s evidence presented at trial tended to show that on 20 February 2009,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Matter of DrakefordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond LindellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond LindellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. State v. MeadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API