Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond Lindell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 8, 2013No. 11–0770Published

1DissentMansfield, Justice

I respectfully dissent and would affirm the district court.

The Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution provides that no person shall “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” U.S. Const, amend. V. In this case, Christopher Lindell was originally charged with stalking A.C. based on a number of incidents that occurred during the June-August 2010 time period. “Stalking” involves a “course of conduct,” in other words, “two or more occasions” of *14“maintaining a visual or physical proximity to a person without legitimate purpose or ... conveying…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. People v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Snow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API