Legal Opinion

National Exchange Bank v. Berry

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1898No. 2,684PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Madison Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

Apellant, plaintiff below, instituted this suit to recover of appellees on five promissory notes executed by Henrietta M. Berry to her co-appellee, and by him indorsed before maturity to appellant as collateral security for two promissory notes executed by appellee McMillen to appellant for borrowed money. Appellee Henrietta M. Berry answered in five paragraphs: (1) A. general denial; the others pleading *262fraud, want of consideration and set-off. Appellant replied (1) by general denial; (2) setting up a consideration on part of appellant, and alleging that appellant had no notice of any fraud,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Tescher v. MereaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Work v. BraytonIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Citizens Bank v. LeonhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Cronkhite v. NebekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Bankers' Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Boxell v. Bright National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Pope v. Branch County Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Erie Crawford Oil Co. v. MeeksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Bence v. DenboIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API