Wells v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The decision of this appeal turns upon the question whether the representations made by the insured in the application for the policies of insurance sued on were material.
The defense set up in the answer was that the replies to the following three questions in the application were false and material:(1) Have you consulted a doctor for any cause not included in above answer? No.(2) Is menstruation regular and normal ? Yes.(3) Are you pregnant ? No.
I. Relating to the first of these questions, it was testified by the family physician that on 7 May, 1935, the insured came to him and he found she…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bryant v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Fishblate v. Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Schas v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Leaksville Woolen MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Hines v. New England Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Jones v. Home Security Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Rhinehardt v. North Carolina Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Ward v. Durham Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.