Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Vinson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1941No. 9181PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lovins, Judge:

On December 31,1940, Virgil K. Kincaid filed his petition in prohibition, original jurisdiction, seeking to prohibit Arthur Vinson, Ezra Knight, a justice of the peace, and John Moore, constable, from proceeding further in the collection of a portion of petitioner’s wages under a sug-gestee execution served upon petitioner’s employer, unless the personal effects of petitioner, including wages, exceed the exemption provided by the Constitution of this State. On January 20, 1941, this Court entered a rule to show cause, directed to the respondents above mentioned.

The following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noce v. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Mayo v. JamesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1855
  3. Kump v. McDonaldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Armstrong v. County-Court of Taylor CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Hatfield Ex Rel. Rose v. CruiseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Turk v. McKinneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Miller v. BarronWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Rorrer v. MurphyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. HENRY COUNTY SCHOOLS v. TYROME DORNELL GRANT, SR.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API