State ex rel. Noce v. Blankenship
West Virginia Supreme Court
Petition by.tbé State, on the relation of Fred Noce, against P. L., Blankenship, Sheriff • of Raleigh County, and. others, that defendants be ruled to show cause why a writ should not be awarded against defendants prohibiting any further action to enforce a judgment against plaintiff by execution or otherwise.
1Opinion of the Court
Lively, Judge:
A rule in prohibition was sought and obtained by petitioner against P. L. Blankenship, sheriff of Raleigh County, Hiram Lizemore, sheriff of Wyoming County, and Sallie Z. and Sam Laxton. There' has been no return to the rule, and petitioner now moves that the writ be issued as prayed for.
The petition avers that each sheriff has in his hands an execution in favor of Sallie Z. and Sam Laxton against petitionei; for the sum of $150 and costs issued on a judgment rendered by -the circuit court of Wyoming County in a suit therein pending in which petitioner is plaintiff and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brazie v. Fayette County CommissionersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Camron v. KenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- City of Charleston v. BellerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
- Wilkinson v. HokeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Moore v. HoltWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Partain v. OakleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. City of Huntington v. LombardoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
- State ex rel. Cecil v. KnappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
- Cowie v. RobertsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Affiliated Construction Trades Foundation v. ViewegWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.