Legal Opinion

Mayo v. James

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 15, 1855PublishedCited by 18 opinions

This was an appeal, by the mayor of the city of Richmond, from a judgment of the Circuit court of the city of Richmond, in a case of prohibition. The facts are stated in the opinion of Judge Moncure.

1Opinion of the CourtMoncure, J.

In September 1853 Clinton James, a free negro, presented a petition to the judge of the Circuit court for the city of Richmond, stating that he had been unlawfully prosecuted before the mayor of said city for a. violation of an ordinance thereof, providing that ‘ ‘no negroes shall keep a cook-shop *within said city, ’ ’ under the penalty of stripes, at the discretion of the mayor; and that he had been duly licensed to keep a cook-shop under the provisions of the act of assembly of April 17th, 1853, Sess. Acts, p. 20, § 4, insisting that the said ordinance is in conflict with the said act of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. MarshallGeneral Court of Virginia · 1808

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. Circuit CourtIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Jelly v. DilsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Wilkinson v. HokeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Midland Investment Corp. v. BallardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. West v. FergusonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1861

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API