Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
We are asked once again to mark the boundaries of state sovereign immunity from suit in federal court. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that immunity did not extend to suits by Indian tribes, and Alaska seeks review of that determination.
I
In 1980, Alaska enacted a revenue-sharing statute that provided annual payments of $25,000 to each “Native village government” located in a community without a state-chartered *778municipal corporation. Alaska Stat. Ann. § 29.89.050 (1984). The State’s attorney general believed the statute to be unconstitutional. In his view, Native village…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by515 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
510 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.