People v. Equarte
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
We granted review in this case and in People v. Piper, post, page 471 [229 Cal.Rptr. 125, 722 P.2d 899], to resolve a conflict in Court *459of Appeal opinions concerning the proper interpretation of several recidivist sentencing provisions—adopted in 1982 as part of Proposition 8—which authorize an additional five-year sentence for defendants convicted of statutorily designated “serious felonies.” (Pen. Code, §§ 667, 1192.7, subd. (c).)1 Here, defendant, convicted of assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. ChagollaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. PiperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. ArwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Charles Anderson Miller v. Daniel B. Vasquez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Ambrose Gill v. Robert J. Ayers, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- People v. BricenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.