Legal Opinion

People v. Equarte

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1986No. Crim. 24651PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

We granted review in this case and in People v. Piper, post, page 471 [229 Cal.Rptr. 125, 722 P.2d 899], to resolve a conflict in Court *459of Appeal opinions concerning the proper interpretation of several recidivist sentencing provisions—adopted in 1982 as part of Proposition 8—which authorize an additional five-year sentence for defendants convicted of statutorily designated “serious felonies.” (Pen. Code, §§ 667, 1192.7, subd. (c).)1 Here, defendant, convicted of assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. ChagollaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. PiperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. ArwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Charles Anderson Miller v. Daniel B. Vasquez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ambrose Gill v. Robert J. Ayers, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. People v. BricenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API