Legal Opinion

Christopher X. Bohlen v. Paul D. Caspari William Webster

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1992No. 91-3360PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Christopher X. Bohlen appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition by the district court. Bohlen argues that he was subject to double jeopardy at a resentencing hearing where the state was given a second chance to prove that he is a persistent offender under Missouri law. Finding that double jeopardy protections apply to persistent offender sentencing proceedings in Missouri, we reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

Bohlen, on July 1,1982, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, on three counts of first degree robbery. On October 15, 1982, the trial…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Caspari v. BohlenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. People v. MongeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. LevinIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Wilmer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API