Legal Opinion
Jaime J. Merino v. Theodore Hocke, U.S. Commissioner, and the United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1961No. 17062PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.
Before us is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court denying an application for writ of mandamus and, in the alternative, a motion for an order directing the United States Commissioner to make an order authorizing the taking of depositions by appellant of certain persons residing in the Republic of Mexico for introduction in evidence in an extradition proceeding then pending before the Commissioner.
The jurisdiction of the United States Commissioner Hocke to hear extradition matters is based on said Commissioner’s Order of Appointment, dated February…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- John R. Frost v. Leon R. Yankwich, Chief Judge, and the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- J. Samuel Wacker v. J. G. Bisson, Consul General, Dominion of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Jaime J. Merino v. United States MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- In Re Daniel EllsbergCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Jaime J. Merino v. Theodore Hocke, United States Commissioner, Etc., and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.