Legal Opinion

Jaime J. Merino v. United States Marshal

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 21, 1964No. 18714_1PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.

Before us'is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California dismissing a petition for habeas corpus filed by appellant. Said petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed in the District Court after an adverse decision by the United States Commissioner following a hearing pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3184. Following such hearing the Commissioner found as a fact, “that the evidence presented is sufficient under 18 U.S.C. § 3184 to sustain the charges under the provisions of the treaty, and" concluded…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Mesarosh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Gaspar Eugenio Jimenez Escobedo v. United States of America, Gustavo Castillo v. Donald D. Forsht, U. S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Jeffrey Phillip Kamrin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Jose Miguel Garcia-Guillern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. J. Samuel Wacker v. J. G. Bisson, Consul General, Dominion of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API