Legal Opinion
Yeasin v. Durham
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 1, 2016No. Case No. 2:16-CV-02010-JARPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JULIE A. ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Navid Yeasin filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendant Tammara Durham, the University of Kansas’s Vice Provost for Student Affairs, retaliated against him in violation of his First Amendment rights and violated his substantive due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 13). The motion to dismiss is fully briefed, and the Court is prepared to rule. For reasons explained more fully below,…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rezac Livestock Commission Co. v. Pinnacle BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- Hunt v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of New Mex.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018