Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Tait

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard F. Kuhnen, J.

Defendants, by order to show cause, move to vacate a judgment against them in the amount of $975.54 entered on February 20, 1979, on the ground that their default in pleading is excusable under CPLR 5015 and that they have a meritorious defense to the action. Execution has been stayed pending the determination of the motion.

The action, to collect moneys owing to Walton Western Auto and Delaware Valley Hospital, plaintiff’s assignors, was instituted by the service of a summons with notice. Within 20 days thereafter, defendant Gloria Tait says, she spoke…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mount Sinai Hospital v. KornegayCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  2. Amsterdam Memorial Hospital v. CintronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. GormanNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Goldman v. Ambro, New York County Courts1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API