Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Ambro
New York County Courts
Decided February 4, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter G. Dounias, J.
The defendant in this contract action to recover for medical services rendered moves, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary judgment dismissing the action. The plaintiff opposes the motion.
The case authority presented by the defendant in support of his motion pertains to the situation where the provider of medical services is a hospital and not an individual physician. The court is not persuaded that the law which has developed with respect to hospital providers can be unqualifiedly imposed upon the individual physician provider who is in a quite different…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Sigety v. IngrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Kaye v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Mount Sinai Hospital v. KornegayCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Amsterdam Memorial Hospital v. CintronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Chambery v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc. v. AsprinioNew York Supreme Court · 2015
- Neurological Sugery Practice of Long Island, PLLC v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023