Legal Opinion
United States v. Doherty
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided April 15, 1937No. 408PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOHOE, District Judge.
The grand jury returned an indictment charging the defendant in some fifteen counts with violations of section 592, title 12 U.S.C.A. It appears from the charge of the indictment that at the times stated, the Bank of Paxton was a state bank, organized under the laws of the state of Nebraska, transacting a banking business, including the receiving of deposits; that at said times, the Bank of Paxton was an insured bank, duly insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation under the provisions of section 264, title 12 U.S.C. A., and that at said times the defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Westfall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Clallam County v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Federal Land Bank v. PriddySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coy U. Spawn, Jr. v. Western Bank--Westheimer, Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Invol. Dissol. of Battle Creek BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Capitol Building & Loan Ass'n v. Commission of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. CasadyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Marshack v. Tapager (In Re Motivation Resources, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.