Legal Opinion

Houde v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 25, 2003No. Nos. 01-P-256 & 01-P-257PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHugh, J.

Patricia Houde and John Minavich were injured while employed by the city of Cambridge. Their applications for accidental disability retirement benefits were denied first by the Cambridge Retirement Board (board) and then by the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (CRAB). They appealed the latter denial to the Superior Court where, after a hearing, judgment entered affirming the CRAB decisions. Now they have appealed to this court claiming financial bias on the part of medical panels that examined them in connection with their applications. They also claim that the medical panels used the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lisbon v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. White v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Hotchkiss v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. Namay v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Pyramid Co. v. Architectural Barriers BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Leominster v. StrattonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  2. Foresta v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Narducci v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  4. Soucy v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API