Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 15, 1998No. 88 Civ. 4486(DNE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by the United States of America against, inter alia, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT” or “the union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (“GEB”). The settlement is embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goals of the Consent Decree are to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of orgánized crime and establish a culture of democracy within the union. The long history of this case has been set forth in this…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Eugene Boffa, Sr., Robert Boffa, Sr., Louis S. Kalmar, Sr., and Chandler LemonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Morrissey v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Karl F. Ritz v. J. J. O'DOnnellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-Cio, Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States of America, Charles M. Carberry v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Ron Carey & William HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Alma Roper, et al. v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal EmployeesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026