Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1989No. B033238PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

This appeal by the City of Los Angeles and its chief of police arises out of disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) against respondent James L. Holcomb.

Holcomb is a Los Angeles Police Officer. On August 13, 1985, Lieutenant York of the LAPD sent a message to Holcomb and his partner, who were in a police vehicle, to return to the police station. Holcomb did not respond to the message or several others which were transmitted shortly thereafter. Ultimately, Holcomb arrived at the station 25 minutes after the initial request to return had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Browning v. BlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Blondell v. Baltimore City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Binkley v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Giuffre v. SparksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Joaquin v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API