Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 26, 1938No. A-9347PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.
The original information in this case charged that in Beckham county, on or about the 25th day of September, 1986, one Case Cox did unlawfully have the possession of a still. An amended information was filed, charging that Case Cox, Bill Fitzgerald and Clarence Fitzgerald on or about the 25th day of September, 1936, did unlawfully have possession of a still.
The name of. the defendant, Case Cox, was indorsed thereon.
The jury by their verdict found the plaintiffs in error guilty as charged and fixed the punishment of each at a fine of $100 and 60 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.
Motion for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Rel Eubanks v. Cole, District JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Noel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- McCurdy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
- Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- McSpadden v. MahoneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.