Wistrom v. Redlick Bros., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. D. Crichton, F. H. Short, and F. E. Cook, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The following statement of the facts, following closely that made by appellant, is substantially correct, and is sufficient for the purposes of this appeal:
On the twenty-third day of May, 1903, plaintiff was riding on his bicycle along the westerly side of K street in the city of Fresno, traveling in a southerly direction. At the same time a delivery wagon was being driven along the same street in a northerly direction, the wagon and team belonging to the appellant and being driven by one of its employees. The plaintiff was riding with ordinary speed. Appellant’s employee thought he was near…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Magee v. North Pacific Coast RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Nehrbas v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bauhofer v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Lampton v. Davis Standard Bread Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. Resolute InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Burkland v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Richards v. Palace Laundry Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.