Legal Opinion

Pacion v. Thomas

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2010No. CV-10-0179-AP/ELPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 The issue in these consolidated cases is whether signatures obtained on nomination petitions before the formation of a candidate’s campaign committee pursuant to A.R.S. § 16-903(A) (2006) must be stricken. We issued an order on June 28, 2010, affirming the judgment of the superior court with an opinion to follow. This is that opinion.

I

¶ 2 John Huppenthal is a Republican candidate for Superintendent of Public Instruction. Bob Thomas is a Republican candidate for State Senator in Legislative District 15. Huppenthal and Thomas (the “Candidates”) each…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moreno v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lubin v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Donaghey v. Attorney GeneralArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bee v. DayArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Bearup v. VossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Sierra Vista v. Sierra Vista Wards System Voting ProjectCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. McNamara v. Citizens Protecting Tax PayersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Leach v. reagan/clean Energy for a Healthy ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  4. City of Sierra Vista v. Sierra Vista Wards System Voting ProjectCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API