McNamara v. Citizens Protecting Tax Payers
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOWNIE, Judge.
¶ 1 The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether qualified electors may maintain a private cause of action based on alleged violations of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 16-915.01 (disposal and use of surplus monies held by political committees). We conclude no such private right of action exists and therefore affirm the superior court’s dismissal of the complaint filed by Jane McNamara, Kim Rosenthal, and Madeleine Kesselman (“Appellants”).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Phoenix City Councilman Sal DiCiccio became the target of a recall effort in 2011.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Hunt v. NortonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Tanya K. v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Blaser v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Fortitude Surgery Center LLC v. Aetna Health IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- McCarthy v. Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48District Court, D. Arizona · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.