Legal Opinion

United States v. James R. Leblanc

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1985No. 84-1018PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, District Judge.

The substantive issue in this appeal is whether a criminal defendant has a right to an evidentiary hearing regarding alleged inaccuracies in his presentence report when the district court does not rely on the disputed information in imposing its sentence. We hold that Rule 32(c)(3)(A) and (D) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure does not require such a hearing. This case also raises a disturbing issue concerning a presentence report that is markedly inconsistent with a recommended offense severity rating obtained pursuant to a Rule 11 plea agreement.

In May of 1972,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robert Louis Farkas v. United States of America, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. David Frank Goldberg v. Warden, Allenwood Federal Prison Camp, Montgomery, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Joseph Legrano, A-K-A Joe LegsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Phillip S. FryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Marco BetancourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Anthony Dwayne AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Adnan ManniCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API