Legal Opinion

In re P.D.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 4, 2007No. 1 CA-JV 07-0057PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The juvenile court adjudicated P.D. (“Juvenile”) delinquent for committing one count of aggravated assault for putting water from a urinal into a teacher-aide’s soda. Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) §§ 13-1203(A)(3) (2001), -1204(A)(6) and (B) (Supp.2006). Juvenile appeals, arguing the juvenile court erred by concluding that his act constituted a prohibited “touching” under A.R.S. § 13-1203(A)(3). For the following reasons, we disagree and therefore affirm.

BACKGROUND1

¶2 Fifteen-year-old Juvenile was in his school’s bathroom one morning with other boys when a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. Medrano-BarrazaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. In Re Jeremiah T.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. State v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. State v. MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Levi HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  2. In Re PDCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API