In re P.D.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 The juvenile court adjudicated P.D. (“Juvenile”) delinquent for committing one count of aggravated assault for putting water from a urinal into a teacher-aide’s soda. Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) §§ 13-1203(A)(3) (2001), -1204(A)(6) and (B) (Supp.2006). Juvenile appeals, arguing the juvenile court erred by concluding that his act constituted a prohibited “touching” under A.R.S. § 13-1203(A)(3). For the following reasons, we disagree and therefore affirm.
BACKGROUND1
¶2 Fifteen-year-old Juvenile was in his school’s bathroom one morning with other boys when a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. Medrano-BarrazaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- In Re Jeremiah T.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Levi HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- In Re PDCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007