State v. Monroe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
IkdictMENT for assault aud battery, tried at August Term, 1897, of Umion Superior Court, before Iloke, I, and a jury. The defendant was convicted and appealed. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Faircloth, C. J.:
AVill Horn administered to Ernest Barrett, a dose of croton oil and the oil had an injurious effect on Barrett. Defendant admits he sold the oil to Horn and at his request dropped it into a piece of candy, but says he did not know that these parties were playing practical jokes on each other and did not know for what purpose Horn wanted the oil. Another witness testified that defendant said that Horn said he wanted the oil “for a fellow.” Defendant denied saying this. Another witness testified to the quinine episode and to Barrett’s and Horn’s tricks with each other.…
2Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Crowell v. . CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Crowell v. CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- State v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- United States v. Rodney VinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.