Legal Opinion

Bank of North Carolina, N.A. v. Cranfill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1979No. 89PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

The case presents the same question as Oil Corporation v. Wolfe, 297 N.C. 36, 252 S.E. 2d 809 (1979), decided this day, and we reach the same result.

On 11 August 1976 plaintiff here brought suit against defendants on a promissory note executed by them and dated 4 February 1972. Defendants admitted signing the note. Immediately above the signature blanks on the note were the words “witness my/our hand(s) and seal(s).” Beside each signature was the printed term “(SEAL).”

Defendants contend that they did not intend to adopt the printed seals as their own. It follows, according to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Security National Bank of Greensboro v. Educators Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Bell v. . ChadwickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Systems, Inc. v. General Heating & Air Conditioning Co. of Greenville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Davis v. Woodlake Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API