Legal Opinion

Mullins v. M.G.D. Graphics System Group

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided September 15, 1994No. 1:93-cv-01954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HULL, District Judge.

This action is before the Court on Defendant Heidelberg’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [14-1], and Defendant AM International’s Motion for Protective Order [27 — l]. 1

I. Defendant Heidelberg’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

Defendant Heidelberg brings this Motion seeking judgment on the pleadings as to Count One (strict liability) and Count Three (breach of warranty) of Plaintiffs Complaint. In considering Defendant Heidelberg’s Motion, the Court must presume, for purposes of this motion, that all well-pleaded factual allegations of the Complaint are…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Beal v. Missouri Pacific R. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. National Metropolitan Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Equifax, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019
  2. In re Equifax, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019
  3. Reichwaldt v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  4. Bush v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025
  5. Bush v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API