Legal Opinion

Beal v. Missouri Pacific R. Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 20, 1941No. 72PublishedCited by 287 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

The question is whether respondent, plaintiff in the district court below, has established a cause of action in equity entitling it to a decree enjoining petitioners, the Attorney General of Nebraska and other state officers from prosecuting respondent’s agents and officers in the state courts for criminal violations of the Nebraska Full Train Crew Law, § 74-519 Comp. Stat. of Nebraska, 1929.

The statute makes it unlawful for any railroad in Nebraska to operate any passenger train of more than five cars “with a crew consisting of less than one engineer, one fireman, one conductor, one brakeman…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Fenner v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by287 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

282 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API