Legal Opinion

Rahr Malting Company, a Wisconsin Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 24, 1958No. 12328PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant (taxpayer) seeks reversal of a determination by the district court that its claim for a refund of excess profit taxes, which had been erroneously assessed and collected, 1 was not filed within the statutory period of limitations. The applicable provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 required that a claim for refund be filed “within two years from the time the tax was paid.” 2 Taxpayer’s claim was filed January 6, 1954. On January 15, 1952, the sum of $13,-410, representing interest on the tax erroneously assessed, was paid in cash, and as to this cash…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Kavanagh v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Girard Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. Hollie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  3. Knowles Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  4. Hansen-Sturm v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Hollie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API