Legal Opinion
Mulhern v. Roach
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 10, 1986PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
The plaintiff, John F. Mulhem, seeks to recover attorney’s fees and expenses allegedly owed him by the defendant, Martin J. Roach, as a consequence of the plaintiff’s sue*19cessful representation of the defendant in two land damage actions against the Newton Redevelopment Authority (NRA). Those actions were tried twice in the Superior Court, first before a judge without a jury, and second before a jury. See G. L. c. 79, § 22, as appearing in St. 1973, c. 983, § 1. Damages assessed at the nonjury trial were $559,481. The jury trial resulted in damages for Roach in the amount of $1,186,101. The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Cummings v. National Shawmut Bank of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Dana M. Wojtkowski v. Richard K. CadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Wasserman v. AgnastopoulosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Beatty v. NP CORP.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- In re FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Malonis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.