Legal Opinion

Bess A. Martin v. Kalvar Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1969No. 26677PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue on appeal is whether the District Court properly denied the motion of Patrick S. Martin to intervene in a shareholder’s derivative action to rescind Kalvar Corporation’s acquisition of the stock of S. O. Systems, Inc. in exchange for Kalvar Corporation stock.

Intervention is divided into two classes under Rúle 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: (a) Intervention of right, and (b) Permissive intervention. If the right to intervene is absolute, the order denying intervention is appealable and may be judged on its merits. 1 If the right to intervene is permissive, no appeal may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Harry J. Stadin v. Union Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  4. Peterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
  5. Freiday v. CowdinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Wheeler v. American Home Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API