Legal Opinion

Cuestas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 17, 1996No. 2-95-358-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARDS, Justice.

During jury selection in Appellant Fredde Lopez Cuestas’s trial for delivery of a controlled substance, the State exercised a peremptory strike on an African American veni-reperson. Cuestas objected to the strike on the basis of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The State responded that it struck the venireper-son on the race-neutral grounds that he was “liberal.” Cuestas contends the State’s questioning of the venireperson did not support the conclusion that he was “liberal.”

Cuestas appeals his conviction and thirty-year sentence.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Vargas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Roberson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donald R. Simmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  2. Donald R. Simmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  3. Garza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Garza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API