Cuestas v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARDS, Justice.
During jury selection in Appellant Fredde Lopez Cuestas’s trial for delivery of a controlled substance, the State exercised a peremptory strike on an African American veni-reperson. Cuestas objected to the strike on the basis of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The State responded that it struck the venireper-son on the race-neutral grounds that he was “liberal.” Cuestas contends the State’s questioning of the venireperson did not support the conclusion that he was “liberal.”
Cuestas appeals his conviction and thirty-year sentence.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vargas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Roberson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Donald R. Simmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- Donald R. Simmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- Garza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Garza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999