Legal Opinion
En Vogue v. UK Optical Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 14, 1994No. CV 93-1976 (ADS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge:
The defendant UK Optical Ltd. (“UK Optical”) moves to dismiss the Complaint as against it for lack of personal jurisdiction, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), and to dismiss the second cause of action in the Complaint alleging violation of the Robinson-Pat-man Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). UK Optical also seeks a protective order governing certain discovery requests pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(e).
BACKGROUND
The defendant UK Optical is a corporation organized under the laws of the United Kingdom, and is engaged in the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Laumann Manufacturing Corp. v. Castings USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Sunrise Industrial Joint Venture v. Ditric Optics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Modern Computer Corp. v. MaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Kultur International Films Ltd. v. Covent Garden Pioneer, FSP., Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Central Sports Army Club v. Arena Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.