Legal Opinion

Modern Computer Corp. v. Ma

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 23, 1994No. CV 93-794 (ADS)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

In this action for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement and patenVeopyright invalidity, the plaintiffs contend that their computer products do not infringe on the copyright and patent of the defendant Hsi K. Ma (“defendant” or “Ma”). According to the plaintiffs, Ma’s copyright and patent are invalid because they were fraudulently obtained. The complaint further alleges pendent state law claims against Ma for tortious interference with the plaintiffs’ contractual and business relations, and unfair competition.

Ma moves pursuant to…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pdk Labs, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Mitchell K. Friedlander, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Neil Bros. Ltd. v. World Wide Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  3. Wyler-Wittenberg v. Metlife Home Loans, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  4. Laumann Manufacturing Corp. v. Castings USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  5. Schwartz v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API