Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between George F. Driscoll Co. & New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1959Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order appealed from affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. We are constrained to hold that under the provisions of the contract no bona fide issue can be tendered for arbitration (Matter of General Elec. Co. [Elec., etc., Workers], 300 N. Y. 262; Matter of International Assn, of Machinists [Cutler-Hammer], 271 App. Div. 917, affd. 297 N. Y. 519; Alpert v. Admiration Knitwear Co., 304 N. Y. 1). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel and M. M. Frank, JJ.; Valente and Stevens, JJ., dissent and vote to grant arbitration in the following memorandum by Valente, J.: We do not share the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between International Association of MacHinists, District No. 15, Local No. 402, & Cutler-Hammer, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Alpert v. Admiration Knitwear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Matter of General Elec. Co. (Elec., Etc., Workers)New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. In re the Arbitration between George F. Driscoll Co. & New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API