Derrickson v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
In this appeal from a conviction for first-degree murder defendant raises five questions which we consider seriatim.
I
After six prosecution witnesses had testified and at the beginning of the third day of trial, the State moved for sequestration of all witnesses. Over defendant’s objec tion, the Court granted the request and we now have several arguments based on that ruling.
A
First, defendant argues that it was improper to sequester after the trial had started and witnesses had testified.
This precise issue has never been decided by a Delaware appellate court but a Superior Court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bantum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- State v. CareyDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1935
- Doe v. RoeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Dutton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.