Legal Opinion
Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Austin
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 13, 1989No. 1592 September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALPERT, Judge.
In this case of first impression we are called upon inter alia, to decide whether the undefined term “hit and run vehicle” in an automobile insurance policy’s uninsured motor vehicle’s coverage excludes accidents where there has been no contact between the insured’s vehicle and the “phantom” vehicle.
The parties have agreed that:
“a motor vehicle accident ... occurred on February 24, 1984, when a truck driven by the Appellee was forced off the road by an unidentified truck (phantom vehicle) which had failed to negotiate a turn and crossed the double yellow line coming into the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Marks Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- First Federated Commodity Trust Corp. v. Commissioner of SecuritiesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Surrey v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Comstock v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Throesch v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2000
- Fry v. Coyote Portfolio, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999