Legal Opinion

Hill v. Henry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1942No. 30294PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This is an action by Cecil L. Henry, as plaintiff, to recover possession of and quiet title to real estate situated in Tulsa county, Okla. It was instituted in the district court of 'Tulsa county on March 9, 1940.

The asserted title of the plaintiff iá derived through a tax deed.

The portion of the defendants (the administratrix and heirs of one Charles E. Hill, deceased) in possession of the property and who claim title and right of possession adverse to that of the plaintiff filed a separate answer and cross-petition seeking to avoid the tax deed and the asserted title claimed under the same.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McGrath v. EichoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Parks v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Schulte v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Grison Oil Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Watts v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morgan v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Kizzire v. SarkeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Crewson v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Dyer v. DaltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Egan v. HenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API