Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Dalton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1946No. 32243PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Plaintiffs in error, the record and equitable owners of a vacant lot in Broken Arrow, Okla., prior to its resale for delinquent taxes in 1942, instituted this action, as plaintiffs, to quiet their title to said lot against defendant in error, as defendant and the purchaser of said lot at said resale The trial court determined from the evidence that defendant’s resale deed was valid and entered^judgment quieting his title accordingly. As plaintiffs have appealed and the parties appear herein in the same order as in the trial court, we will hereinafter refer to them by their trial court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lind v. McKinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. House v. MainkaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Sarkeys v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Chamberlain v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. O'Keefe v. DillenbeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carman v. McMahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Kizzire v. SarkeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Chapman v. CalhounSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Trappe v. FreebornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Opinion No. (2000), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API