Brusstar v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, Chief Judge.
This is an action by employees 1 of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) to recover unpaid overtime wages allegedly due under § 7(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). Plaintiffs have moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, contending that SEPTA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, is obligated to comply with the FLSA. For the reasons stated below, I will grant plaintiffs’ motion.
Under the FLSA, employees must be paid for time worked in excess of 40 hours per week at a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGrath v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Toombs v. ManningDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Bester v. Chicago Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987