Legal Opinion

Brusstar v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-3773PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUONGO, Chief Judge.

This is an action by employees 1 of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) to recover unpaid overtime wages allegedly due under § 7(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). Plaintiffs have moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, contending that SEPTA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, is obligated to comply with the FLSA. For the reasons stated below, I will grant plaintiffs’ motion.

Under the FLSA, employees must be paid for time worked in excess of 40 hours per week at a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGrath v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Toombs v. ManningDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Bester v. Chicago Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API